If I edited your post to make it in line with my feelings... nothing would be changed. Your post perfectly describes all my feelings about this horrible, irrational, selfish woman.

On a side note, I'm glad she started saying all those crazy things, or else the MSM would still be following her around and putting her on the news every night.

The Iraqis want democracy, let them fight for it themselves like everybody else. By the way, thanks for supporting the Soviets in WW2. I guess democracy wasn't so important to you back then.

Toute nation a le gouvernement qu'elle mérite.
- Joseph de Maistre

Wow, Freedom, is that left-handed support for the Sheehan types? I read your comments as obviously anti-US involvement in Iraq. Was it okay for Saddam to stately sponsor terrorist training that would probably find its way into the US (remember the airliner training site)? Is it truly okay for any national leader to exterminate hundreds of thousands of his/her own citizens because of opposition paranoia (remember the WMDs employed on the Kurds)?

As a Vietnam and Desert Shield/Desert Storm veteran and a veteran of covert ops in Central America, I have a personal and professional disdain for the Cindy (Jane Fonda) Sheehan types that denounce our country and give comfort to our enemy... all while claiming the attribute of patriotism. To me that's kind of like a rapest claiming the attribute of virginity, or an athiest claiming the rights of Heaven. No matter how many times Cindy or Jane lay claim to patriotism, it is something they just cannot possess while espousing hateful rhetoric about their country, and their country's warriors.

By my 31 years of military service alone I have ensured that the Cindys and Janes have the free right to say what they wish and I still support that liberty. But freedom of speech does also bear a freedom of consequences. If you callously speak ill of the country I love, I've earned the right to speak ill of you and your hateful rhetoric. Fortunately, today there are more folks who agree with me than with the Cindys and Janes. It wasn't always that way... just review national mood of the 60's and 70's.

It pleases me that Cindy's rhetoric is not receiving the MSM coverage that it once received. Unfortunately, where the MSM is involved, it just means they have moved on to something more timely that they think will smear the current presidency and conservative movement.

Casey Sheehan's mother doesn't give a damn about him either. He stood, and died, for everything she opposes; her debasement and deceit is evinced in the very act of holding him up as HER sacrifice, supposedly imposed on her by the President.

Loathing is too mild a term for the repulsion I feel toward her.

As Tammy Bruce would say...

Cindy Sheehan is in the depths of malignant narcissism. She does not want to move to the stage of reintegrating into society; she only wants to harm society as she believes she herself has been harmed.

The woman is a waste of skin and mentally sick. The woman would make a great nazi (both are leftist).

Just hazarding a guess, but maybe Casey enlisted and re-enlisted in part to get away from his lunatic mother, in addition to being a patriot.

SicSemper: I would too. :)

Try to download and watch this documentry. It is very interresting it is called 'The Power Of Nightmares'by BBC

http://ia300024.us.archive.org/1/items/ThePowerOfNightmares/

There's nothin' quite like the family values crowd wishing a woman to hell.

I love the smell of fresh indictments in the morning.

-D

Denise, Whether or not Cindy should end up in Hell will be entirely upon her own shoulders. All the well wishers in the world cannot put her there.

Sir you have put into words exactly how I feel about this communist 'liberal' traitor...as a vet with 3 honorable discharges and years of service and killed communists in many places, seems to me it should start here too....a liberal is a closet communist...

Thank you

To freedom and denise...."what a bunch of maroons"

Bugs Bunny

Unfortunately the 2000th soldier to die in Iraq misses the fact that the military refuses to list the almost 8000 soldiers who died of wounds suffered in Iraq but died out of the country.

Still more unfortunate is the need to loath anyone in regards to Iraq. As senior officials continue to make clear, the administration the war was a mistake on many levels. Because we lost young people for nothing; intelligence was bent for political purposes; Iraq totters into civil war; and would be terrorists blossom in the chaos. Meanwhile here at home we turn on each other (even a mother who, regardless of her politics, is stricken with grief)and become less like a proud moral nation and more like a bickering 6th grade class.

Got any credible sources for that claim of 8,000 troops who died out of country...the Lancet perhaps? Or was it from your friends in Code Pink outside of Walter Reed calling our troops baby killers and murderers?

It seems like a story that big would have been picked up by the NY Times or similar oganizations in a heartbeat, if they were real.

We lost young people for "nothing?"

The vast majority of 25 million Iraqis who are no longer under the thumb of Saddam might just disagree.

Thank you, Confederate Yankee, for answering that last post by Paul the leftist, as well as for your entire column. You are a great American. Anyone that thinks that any one of our great military that gave his/her life for Operation Iraqi Freedom was a waste has a twisted world view. These leftist/socialist/communists are pathetic. They cry out about Hitler, oppression, civil rights violated, etc. when it comes to their own country but when some other dictator, whom they somehow praise and idolize (e.g.: Castro, Saddam, Chavez, Mandela), does all of the above and more, they turn their heads. Starve their own people, no complaint. America comes to help and 18 Marines get slaughtered, no problem. Hypocrisy at its best. They view things through their prism where if their hero Bill Clinton was doing the bomb dropping at 30,000 feet (Kosovo), they have no problem. Oh, the hypocrisy...

Hey, Paul, here's a bit of a civics lesson for you... one of the minor differences between our democratic republic and communism or totalitarianism is that people who speak out against the government in our country are protected by our constitution - they are NOT summarily executed.

“Still more unfortunate is the need to loath anyone in regards to Iraq.” Did you read the third comment? It’s mine. I said nothing about “loathing” when I wrote about Cindy-Jane. To loathe is to “dislike.” I specifically said “I have a personal and professional disdain for the Cindy (Jane Fonda) Sheehan types…” Disdain, Paul, is “extreme contempt or disgust.” “Loathe” just doesn’t represent the feeling. No matter the shade of glasses through which you wish to view Cindy, she is NOT a grieving mother – she is an opportunist who is using her son’s noble sacrifice as a platform from which she has launched into a political hack (or more appropriately “hag”.) “Greater love hath no man than to give his life for another.” Cindy is robbing Casey of the love he displayed to his fellow soldiers and countrymen, and she is robbing him of his nobility. Casey voluntarily served his country and fellow man; Cindy is voluntarily condemning and speaking hatefully against the country Casey gave his life defending. No, Cindy is not a grieving mother; she is a sad demented political hack who is defaming her son’s bravery by her sick motives and actions. She is snatching defeat from the jaws of her very own son’s victory!

Now, before you come at me with any kind of misguided “patriotic” claim, please do us both a favor and read or reread my previous post. After you’ve reread my post, come back and tell me how many miles you’ve walked in my shoes. How many people shouted “baby killer” and spat at you when you returned from Vietnam? How many people greeted you like royalty when you returned from Desert Shield/Desert Storm? How many years have you spent away from your family training for war and helping to protect other nations from communist aggression? How many months have you spent in extreme environments (from freezing cold to scorching hot) and how many 100-plus hour weeks have you spent practicing the art of defending your nation? When your boots and your body are as worn as mine, come back and talk with me about patriotism and love of country. Until then, you hollowly spew ideological rhetoric that you have no intention of physically defending at the possible cost of your own life.

I, on the other hand, loathe her. But not "in regards to Iraq". I loathe her because she gives comfort to our enemies worldwide, demoralizes our brave soldiers, and weakens American resolve at a time when unity is most important.

I also think her actions increase terrorist activity, causing additional deaths and casualties, but I have no proof.

Paul, Your comment about of soldiers dying in the states instead of in-country is a load of manure. Specifically, the Sgt. who died & is counted as #2000 died in the states from wounds rec'd in-country about 2 weeks previous.
How does that square with your preconceived notions?

I've got my mind made up, don't confuse me with the facts????