Conffederate
Confederate

May 24, 2007

At It Again

The Associated Press got their facts wrong on yet another firearms-related story today, something I know that readers will find absolutely shocking.

In this story about Moscow, Idaho gunman Jason Hamilton, they made two glaring fact errors regarding the firearms used in Hamilton's deadly Sunday rampage.

They waste no time, blowing the facts in the lede.

A man who went on a deadly shooting rampage with two high-powered assault rifles was supposed to have surrendered his firearms after being convicted of domestic assault, authorities said Wednesday.

By definition, "assault rifles" are not high-powered.

Further, they are selective-fire, meaning they can be fired semi-automatically (one bullet at a time for each trigger pull) or automatically (multiple shots per trigger pull), with the mode of fire determined by a selector switch on the weapon. Neither of these firearms had that capability.

And what were the firearms used?

Hamilton used an AK-47 assault rifle and a Springfield M-1A rifle, both bought legally before he was convicted of assaulting his girlfriend in 2006, Duke said.

I'll state that the Associated Press flatly blew it here.

AK-47s are heavily regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934 (requiring an extensive, nearly prohibitive background check), and none have been imported or manufactured for civilian sale in the United States since 1986. Because demand among collectors is much higher than supply, a true AK-pattern rifle would probably cost between $16,500-$20,000, using this site as a guide.

A janitor, Hamilton would not likely be able to afford such a firearm.

He carried out his attacks with a rifle that looked like an AK-47, but it is no more an AK-47 than this 1987 Pontiac is a Ferrari.

New let's refer back to the lead for one second.

If you recall, it said two "assault rifles" were used. We've already established the fact that neither weapon fit the definition, and that one of those firearms could only be termed an assault rifle based upon how it looked. The other firearm doesn't even look like one.

This is the Springfield Armory M-1A.

SpringfieldM1A

Even by the most tortured media definition, the M-1A is no assault rifle or assault weapon. It is most properly categorized as a battle rifle, and it is typically valued in both military and civilian shooting circles for it's long-range precision. As such, it is very popular in target competitions.

Once again, the media blew the facts in a firearms-related story.

Surprising, I know.

Posted by Confederate Yankee at May 24, 2007 10:14 AM
Comments

Clayton Cramer reports that the AK was a full-auto--most interesting, given the occupation of this guy.

See: http://www.claytoncramer.com/weblog/2007_05_20_archive.html#7616480687916982506

Posted by: dad29 at May 24, 2007 12:17 PM

They're not dumb, they want to scare people with the term. "Rifle" doesn't cut it. Firearm? Nope. Ah, "Assault Rifle!" Scary!

Since they're not interested in accuracy it's pointless to go on at length about it, you're only preaching to the choir.

I guess there might be a few followers of the rabid gun-ban crowd who might read and seriously consider a lengthy explanation/definition, but it's doubtful.

Don't get me wrong, it must be pointed out every time they are inaccurate (intentional or not). The use of the term "assault rifle" is one of my pet peeves so thanks for pointing out that they care more about embellishing a story than telling the truth.

Posted by: DoorHold at May 24, 2007 12:31 PM

I've noticed this on "true crime" shows as well: Full auto sound effects over survelliance video of a perp firing what is eventually identified as an SKS.

Posted by: Fox 2! at May 26, 2007 11:21 PM