October 06, 2008
Obama's Attempt to Undermine The Constitution
While at the left-wing Joyce Foundation, Barack Obama was part of a plot to subvert the Constitution by corrupting legal scholarship with the goal of conning the Supreme Court into destroying the Second Amendment.
This isn't an op-ed. This is fact.
Barack Obama has a lot in common with the goals of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. He just prefers to use laundered grant money instead of bombs.
Obama is a radical left wing terrorist sympathizer that makes Jimmy Carter look like a conservative
Posted by: Larry Johnson at October 6, 2008 10:09 AMComplete control fo the Supreme court for decades is within grasp of Obama and the heirs of Ayers. Stock up now if you want to own something that shoots.
Posted by: mytralman at October 6, 2008 10:16 AMYou're kidding me right? This "plan" hinges on the fact that judges will cite law review articles to explain an opinion. Law review articles are not law, only secondary sources. You must think that all judges are pretty stupid.
This is another example of Republicans using fear to try and win elections and get their way. Guess what? It's not going to work. Look at the polls. Game over.
Posted by: mj at October 6, 2008 10:29 AMmj,
I see where the dems are also very good at stuffing the ballot box. Look at what's going on in Ohio.
Posted by: belad at October 6, 2008 11:04 AM"Increase Federal Taxes on Guns and Ammunition by 500 Percent" and "Close Down 90 Percent of Gun Shops in America" are classified as “uncertain” because even though Obama has indeed supported these policies in the past, FactCheck.org was unable to get the Obama campaign to state what his current position was on these issues. Yet, it is hard to see how FactCheck.org could even raise questions about the NRA ads on these points since Obama clearly held these positions in the past and has never said that he has changed his mind on them. The very fact that the Obama campaign would not issue any statement disowning these previous positions would seem to imply that Obama still supported them.
Posted by: CrystalD at October 6, 2008 11:38 AMI can not believe these democrats. Did you read today that BIden has tried to argue that the V-P is not part of the executive branch?
Posted by: mike at October 6, 2008 11:44 AMDidn't Barry just a week ago declare his passionate belief in the 2nd Ammendment? I guess it depends on the meaning of "belief". You could believe that it existed; that it was written into the Bill of Rights, but was null, or archaic, or just in too bad taste to be the law of the land. Is that it? Hilariously, gun control pretty much lost the election for Gore as it cost him his home state of Tennessee. Does Team Barry really want a new horde of single issue voters from the bitter-clinger demo? Doesn't seem like genius politics.
Posted by: megapotamus at October 6, 2008 12:12 PMUm MIke, Where did you hear that VP stuff. I think someone has been messing with you because that is what Cheney did this last year.
mj says:
"You're kidding me right? This "plan" hinges on the fact that judges will cite law review articles to explain an opinion. Law review articles are not law, only secondary sources. You must think that all judges are pretty stupid."
Like the Supreme Court relying on European laws to ban juvenile death sentences? Or maybe "emanations and penumbras" which supported Roe v. Wade? Or Suiter writing for the majority in favor of eminent domain? By all means, let's assume that judges are smart, and that they will rule impartially!!
Posted by: Michael Smith at October 6, 2008 02:28 PMAndy,
I think you are wrong about Cheney. I am pretty certain that is what Biden has been quoted as saying according to Foxnews.
Posted by: mike at October 6, 2008 04:03 PM
