December 31, 2008

Ending Gaza

Let's put this bluntly: the Gaza Strip is a failed non-state run by terrorists pledged to genocide and dreaming of a second Holocaust. It has no discernible reason to exist other than to hate; no notable exports greater than the crude rockets and mortars targeting Israeli civilians for merely daring to exist.

Lets end it. It was a mistake. It's time to close Gaza.

Empty the 1.4 million Gazans living in squalor into the surrounding Arab nations who helped make it a modern Hell. Send them to Egypt. Syria. Jordan. Lebanon. Let these nations deal with the extremism they've midwifed by absorbing the bastard Arabs of the Middle East into their own societies.

Granted, such a repatriation will be welcomed by neither the Arabs of Gaza nor the nations who have to host the violent illiteracy and religious extremism they helped create.

But it is the only viable long-term solution for peace.

And an idea long overdue.

Posted by Confederate Yankee at December 31, 2008 10:19 AM

I agree, Gaza should become a buffer zone with nothing allowed to grow or be build over ankle high. A massive carpet bombing campaign should do the trick and close the rat holes the Mooslimes have dug all over the land of murder and rape.

Posted by: Scrapiron at December 31, 2008 11:49 AM

I second the carpet bombing idea. . . I am just not sure they should let them out of the area first. The terrorists living there will just fight from their new home if given a chance. . ..

Posted by: JD at December 31, 2008 12:20 PM

Good idea, but I think all those countries will resist violently. They know what has been created and will resist. But that would be nice to see.

Posted by: Federale at December 31, 2008 12:54 PM

lots of empty land in Saudi Arabia......

Posted by: redc1c4 at December 31, 2008 01:06 PM

With one small difference I will agree totally. Just substitute "palestine" for Gaza.

Posted by: Ken Hahn at December 31, 2008 01:18 PM

One Israeli nuke-- send those chernozhopi straight to Hell.

Posted by: Ivan Ivanovich Renko at December 31, 2008 01:23 PM

Proposal for a durable cease-fire: Give the Hammies one week. Count the number of rockets fired over the border in that week. Destroy everything, animate or otherwise, starting from the boarder and proceeding one meter west for every rocket during the baseline week. Repeat as necessary with a multiplier of two, then three and so on. Even if no one has the stomach for that (yet) stop feeding these scum as well as providing them energy, medical care and whatever else is the largess of Israel, the US and the UN. These pukes are pirates at best. Anyone with a claim to being a "moderate" Palastinian had best demonstrate that through deeds, pronto.

Posted by: megapotamus at December 31, 2008 02:06 PM

Works for me.

Posted by: Vaultenblogger at December 31, 2008 02:38 PM

While we're at it, make sure we deal with the Cynthia McKinneys attempting to aid the terrorists.

Posted by: Conservative CBU at December 31, 2008 02:51 PM

Yeah, did McKinney's canoe get searched? I wonder if it was all baby-milk and Band-Aids.

Posted by: megapotamus at December 31, 2008 03:10 PM

"But it is the only viable long-term solution for peace"

Indeed. It could almost be called the "Final Solution" to the "Palestinian Problem".


Posted by: Oyka at December 31, 2008 03:38 PM

Oh, I know I know hear me out...Maybe you should suggest that we round up all these Gazans...perhaps COCENTRATE them all together in one spot (a camp or camps if you will) or in several places.


Posted by: Oyka at December 31, 2008 03:48 PM

Oyka -

Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan already do just that. And since they have no birthright citizenship laws, children born in the CONCENTRATEs have no Lebabon, Syrian, or Jordanian citizenship.

Boy that sucks, huh?

Posted by: Adriane at December 31, 2008 04:05 PM

Mega, makes no difference to me if it IS all baby milk and bandaids. Aiding and abetting the terrorists, is aiding and abetting, no matter what it is you're shipping to them.

Cynthia McKinney should be IMMEDIATELY placed under arrest upon touching US soil.

Posted by: Conservative CBU at December 31, 2008 04:18 PM

Cato the Elder had the right idea:
"Carthage must be destroyed."

The words are supposed to be have been repeated by Cato at the end of every speech he made in the senate, after his visit to Carthage in 175 B.C., when he became obsessed by the military threat posed by the city. It was eventually destroyed by Rome at the end of the Third Punic War in 146 B.C.

Contrary to legend, the soil of Carthage was not sown with salt.

The Palis should suffer Carthage's fate. But it won't happen.

Posted by: miriam at December 31, 2008 05:16 PM

Kill everybody and let god sort them out seems to be your line.

No wonder the rest of the world things you are crazy, still as Bush has the man from Manchuria has wrecked your economy you wont be able to kill as many people in 2009 as 2008.

Posted by: Derek Wall at December 31, 2008 07:12 PM

Great idea, but won't work because the presnt situation is exactly what the Arabs states want it to be. They invented the notion of "Palestine" as a proxy for their continuously failed wars of extermiantion against Israel. Not only do the hapless Palis do all the bleeding and suffering and dying on their behalf, but Israel gets transformed from David into Goliath and instantly becomes a bully in world opinion, for the heinous crime of defending itself.

Derek, we don't give a rat's ass for the opinion of what you delusionally claim is "the rest of the world." You're a bloody handed accessory to genocide, feel free to STFU - or better yet, go stand in front of a Hamas missile factory as a subhuman shield.

Posted by: Steve Skubinna at December 31, 2008 07:32 PM

Killing the Palestinians won't solve the problem. It will only infuriate the Arabs, who will then become an even greater problem than the Palestinians.

No, the only solution is to kill them all, Palestinians and Israeli's alike - just sterilize the whole area and start over with the Amish.

Posted by: M. Onan Batterload at December 31, 2008 10:07 PM
Kill everybody and let god sort them out seems to be your line.

Did you read that somewhere, Derek? Did you read the post? What does it say? As for your second sentence, don't drink and type. It never works out well.

Posted by: Pablo at December 31, 2008 11:13 PM

This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 1/1/2009, at The Unreligious Right

Posted by: UNRR at January 1, 2009 11:21 AM

The great irony is that the Palestinians could be rich if they wanted to be. If they took all the aid money they receive and used it to build an infrastructure and businesses instead of spending it on munitions and feathering the nests of Hamas leaders, they'd be leading very comfortable lives. Consider Gaza - that is prime beachfront property. And the Pals took it over and trashed it.

But peace and prosperity isn't what they're interested in - not when there are Jews around to kill.

Never have a people been so undeserving of sympathy - and yet the murderous SOB's get it from moronic tools the world over. Why? Well, let's put it this way - the Palis are very, very fortunate to have the enemies they do. If other Arabs were killing them, nobody would pay attention or give a damn.

Posted by: Donna V. at January 1, 2009 10:14 PM

Saudi Arabia needs foreign workers....half of the O/S foreigners could then be released to return to their homes.....problem is, the koran forbids having muslims as slaves and that messes up the Saudi plan. Guess they'll have to send them all to Lebanon. Lebanon is a palestinian controlled Iranian puppet now anyway and the thugs from Gaza and the West Bank would fit right in(after, of course, a bunch of gangland style killings and suicide bombings to sort out the heirarchy). The remaining Labanese that haven't yet moved to Dearborn, Michigan or Chicago will have to hash out living arrangements for the rest of the palestinians. That will give Israel a couple years of respite to salt the borders with minefields and resettle Gaza and West Bank with settlers. Cool plan eh?

Posted by: Tonto at January 2, 2009 11:53 AM


As a 2nd generation American whose paternal grandfather (and his father and grandfather) emigrated from northern Lebanon, I take exception to sending more murderous blankety-blanks to one of my ancestral homelands.

Of course, if it leads those blankety-blanks to their ultimate doom I'm all for it :)

Posted by: PhyCon at January 2, 2009 12:19 PM

Prior to the 1967 war, Gaza was part of Egypt (or at least administered by Egypt) and the West Bank was administered by Jordan. In the Camp David accords, Egypt wanted the Sinai back (minus settlers) but didn't demand/ask for Gaza as far as I can tell.

So whose fault is it the arabs in West Bank and Gaza don't have a country?

Posted by: iconoclast at January 2, 2009 01:15 PM

The funny thing, iconoclast, is the timeline.

So, in 1967, Gaza was part of Egypt, and the West Bank was part of Jordan.

But when was the Palestine Liberation Organization (dedicated to liberating Palestine) founded? 1965!

So, what, exactly, was the PLO seeking to liberate?

All of a sudden, it would seem that the PLO, and the Palestinians in general as well as their Arab backers, weren't so much interested in liberating Gaza and the West Bank, as Tel Aviv, Haifa, and all the other parts of Israel, pre-1967.

Posted by: Lurking Observer at January 2, 2009 01:34 PM

So you want a genocide? Stay classy, should get you back into power real soon.

Posted by: WOW at January 3, 2009 11:50 AM

WOW, I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Everyone "knows" that civilians are just packed into Gaza, right? And the Israelis are armed with a full arsenal of modern weapons, from F-16s and cluster munitions to multiple launch rocket systems.

So, how many casualties have there been in the past five days? Five hundred? A thousand?

This must mean that the Jews are some of the most incompetent genocidal murderers out there, because with this massive arsenal of weapons, they can't kill more than 100-200 people a day! And this, with minimal anti-aircraft barrages and no SAMs from Hamas.

It almost raises the question, given this incredible level of incompetence, why Hamas hasn't liberated all of Israel by now!

That, or maybe your terms and concepts are wildly out of whack.


Posted by: Lurking Observer at January 3, 2009 12:45 PM

Moderate Palestinians?
I think they all left for more stable, secure places long ago. Only the terrorists and those too poor to leave are left now.

Posted by: AngryConservative at January 3, 2009 09:01 PM

One question: How many Palestinian lives are worth an Israeli's. Because I see the current response as very unproportional. Hamas launches simple rockets that manage to kill few over a few years (although not taking into account the psychological toll). In response Israel launches airstrikes and now a ground invasion that has managed to kill hundreds more, dozens if not hundreds of those being innocent civlians (they are not all Hamas).

So what is it? Is an innocent Israeli worthy of life as much as an innocent Palestinian because I hear very little regard when Israel destroys innocent Palestinians. And as it turns out, in this conflict more innocent Palestinian blood has been spilt and is on the hands of Israel than innocent Israeli blood on the hands of both Hamas and Fatah over the WHOLE course of this conflict.

Nobody will deny that more Palestinians have died.

Posted by: Oyka at January 3, 2009 10:57 PM

Nice try, Oyka. Sorry, but I for one refuse to play this game of goal-post shifting.

You start the fight, you're gonna have to pay for it.

The Palestinians fire rockets at the Israelis, they're going to pay for it. To throw the first punch (or several dozen or several hundred over several years) and then to cry "Foul!" because the other side shellacks you is nonsense.

If you break my little finger every week, does this mean that I am not allowed, after a year, to do more than break your little finger?

That is neither just, nor supporting the concept of deterrence.

That's just the philosophical problem w/ your "argument." That doesn't touch on just how many of those "civilians" are Hamas (at least you admit that many of them are). That doesn't touch on how Hamas is based AMONG civilians. That doesn't touch on how Hamas refuses to allow wounded Gazans to get medical care even in Egypt. (Whose fault is that, Oyka? The Zionists?)

By this "logic," the US should have stopped after the several thousand sailors killed at Pearl Harbor had been equaled by the number of Japanese killed?

But somehow, from your previous comments, I suspect you don't actually give a fig about the sons of apes and pigs. I don't think you give a fig about how Hamas brought the fire down upon Gazans, nor about how they have had no regard for Gazan casualties.

Which is why I won't bother wasting time with you.

Posted by: Lurking Observer at January 4, 2009 12:41 AM

Lurking is correct. If one country starts a war, no sane individual is going to listen to them when they complain about losing the very war they started.
If Mexico was shelling El Paso on a daily basis, I would expect that the USA would do more than just lob a few grenades back over the Rio Grande.

Posted by: Angry Conservative at January 4, 2009 06:40 AM

Oyka, what would a "proportional" Israeli response look like? Should they just fire back into Gaza, rocket for rocket, mortar for mortar? Or should they just kill/maim a Gaza civilian for each Israeli that suffers the same fate?

Posted by: Pablo at January 4, 2009 12:45 PM

The only problem with the idea of putting the Palestinians elsewhere is that there is no Arab government that would be willing to accept them. They have already been booted out of Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt because they became involved in those countries internal political processes. Their purpose was to de-stabilize those countries, and install a Pro-Palestinian government. Needless to say, the rulers of those countries had some issues with such plans.

The fact that that Hamas-led Palestinians are openly associated with and backed by Iran (Persians, not Arabs), makes Arab nations even less likely to accept them.

Posted by: Dan at January 5, 2009 06:34 AM

The Arabs in the other countries don't give a rat's arse for Palestinians...if they did, they would simply repatriate them willingly, but they don't care.

I say Israel goes all the way, wipes out Hamas and Fatah, and whoever wants to live in peace can live under Israeli rule. Their life will be astronomically better under their care than under the current terrorist regime who have done nothing to promote the well-being of Palestinians.

Posted by: Richard Romano at January 5, 2009 04:17 PM

"Hamas launches simple rockets that manage to kill few over a few years"

No doubt, a foolish, university educated leftist, taught well by his/her professors.

Posted by: Richard Romano at January 5, 2009 04:19 PM

Reading some of the troll posts, I am reassured that they are as stupid as ever. If not worse than before. Israel has been taking it, and taking it for YEARS. As someone said, how much are you supposed to take before you strike back? The entire purpose of Ham-Ass is to destroy Israel. So...what? Israel just lays down and dies? Would they?
Carpet bomb with neutrons. There is brainwashing from birth by these slime, so nothing must be left alive. Do you simply carve out the bulk of a cancerous tumor, or do you carve out everything you can detect and give chemo or radiation to kill any possible remaining cancer cells? It is a shame that these animals are programmed from birth. But they are. So in the interest of humanity this must be stopped, however is needed.

Posted by: cmblake6 at January 6, 2009 08:39 PM