Conffederate
Confederate

April 14, 2009

20/20 Blows Another Gun Story

No, ABC News didn't put explosives in a gas tank, but they certainly stacked the deck in creating Diane Sawyer's "guns are bad, guns are useless" self-fulfilling prophecy, which AWR Hawkins deftly exposes at Pajamas Media.

The scenario is worth watching, if only to point out the flaws in the contrived scenario, starting with neophytes playing the role of CCH holders, the CCHs being forced to wear a holster in a position where they could not draw their weapon in a sitting postion (and would not think of carrying a weapon in real life simply for reasons of comfort).

And of course, ABC rigged an outcome where the only possible outcome was the death of students in the scenario, with the only question being "how many?"

In real life, of course, there is never just one possible scenario or possible outcome.

As I noted in a comment at PJM, what ABC News pointedly didn't run is what I would dub the "Virginia Tech" scenario.

Have a student with a concealed weapons hear shots in another classroom, draw his weapon, and cover the door. Then tell me how far the shooter gets through that classroom door, compared to rooms without a CCH.

Alternately, think about the possible reaction of CCH to seeing an agitated man pull a weapon or enter the hallway brandishing the weapon on the way to a classroom. Frankly, if I was a student or faculty member with a CCH and saw an agitated man pull a weapon as he entered a class room in front of me, my immediate reaction would be to draw my sidearm and draw a bead on the back of his skull and close the distance.

It isn’t always that the CCH closest to the threat is immediately on top of it, or that in a mass shooting, the perp will always have the element of surprise on his side.

People who legally carry concealed weapons are not going to magically prevent attempted mass murders. There are simply too few of us in the general population, and well-meaning but ignorant people in positions of power make it far too difficult to carry in the very settings (schools, businesses, civic buildings) where such attacks are most likely to occur.

But just because a concealed carry permit holder can't be everywhere a shooting takes place or prevent people from always getting killed in these rampages doesn't negate their potential to alter or terminate a threat in some scenarios.

It's funny, but the same people who rail against concealed weapons because they are concerned about the rare instances of CCH permit holders becoming violent never seem to want to talk about the possible lives that could be saved by them.

It's almost as if they have an agenda...

Posted by Confederate Yankee at April 14, 2009 10:56 AM
Comments

There are no second amendment protections in Mexico. And now that the government and the drug cartels have merged into a single business unit, there is nothing that the average Mexican can do - even to protect his own family.

Perhaps Diane Sawyer would like to live there?

Posted by: MAS1916 at April 14, 2009 11:14 AM

My guess: it's because liberals simply don't believe guns can save lives. Ever. Their view of guns is very simple: Guns! Kill! People! Whether the dead person is an innocent victim or a would-be killer, all they see is the body.

On a tangent, related to a previous post: like Instapundit says, I'd like to see some media jerk claim that this arsenal was bought in the US. In passing, I noted that the reporter botched the story as usual: the big gun on the tripod, identified as "an anti-aircraft gun," is no such thing. It's an air-cooled machine gun, I think a .30-caliber Browning M1919. Made primarily for ground targets, like enemy soldiers and unarmored vehicles.

Posted by: wolfwalker at April 15, 2009 07:10 AM

"But just because a concealed carry permit holder can't be everywhere a shooting takes place or prevent people from always getting killed in these rampages doesn't negate their potential to alter or terminate a threat in some scenarios."

The same can be said about the Police. They can't be everywhere, nor can they prevent all crimes. That is not an argument to abolish police forces.

Posted by: George Bruce at April 16, 2009 05:30 PM