Barack Hussein Obama is not the "leader of the free world". He is the Feuhrer of the death camps and is personally responsible for genocide.

Yes, I will "lay that on him". He doesn't deserve the title "leader of the free world". He is the "leader of genocide".

Infants are people, too. Infanticide at the level of 50,000,000 American lives is American genocide. The buck stops with Obama. He's in the White House now.

I promise to be a good father and be there for my children so that they don't grow up to be as messed up as Mr. Obama. Like him I also did not have a father but I will take care of my children and always respect there right to life.

I suppose a baby can be considered a punishment...

So explain to me again why our executive leader dislikes punishing irresponsible behavior? Teach the consequences of the actions, and let that be a deterrent--don't just excuse the behavior as a mistake if they're informed and do it anyway!

How can a president ever discipline a bureaucracy if he dislikes 'punishing' slackers with the just and reasonable consequences of their actions???

Bristol Palin does not think her baby is punishment.

And neither does Levi Johnston it appears.

Will Obama speak about "The Bitter Alcoholic Philandering Socialist African Father I Never Knew But Who I Wrote a Book About Anyway to Advance My Brilliant Career"?

I don't know if it is ironic or not that Obama's policies lead directly to the deaths of tens of millions of African Americans. A rather disproportionate number of blacks in America have abortions than others, and like the first post alludes, such deaths are assuring that the number of blacks will dwindle, and inevitably be destroyed.

Barack Obama has the "Black Community" in his back pocket, yet his policies (both societal and fiscal) are ruining it. If people would sit down and THINK about what this man is doing, and how his agenda leads to despotism and tyranny, they'd be calling for his head. Unfortunately, liberal "education" and media propaganda have made a huge portion of our population into helpless waifs.

It is unfortunate that some people just cannot seem to differentiate gametes, embryos, foetuses, dead foetuses, newborns, and infants into their proper categories with the proper/appropriate characteristics allied thereunto.

Equivocation is NOT your friend, folks!

"It is unfortunate that some people just cannot seem to differentiate gametes, embryos, foetuses, dead foetuses, newborns, and infants into their proper categories with the proper/appropriate characteristics allied thereunto.

Equivocation is NOT your friend, folks!"

It is Obama who does not differentiate. They are all sacrificed at the door of the woman's right to choose.

What is the difference between a new born and an infant?

I feel that one of the problems with the conservative movement and the right is the issue of abortion. It seems that a portion of conservatives can not seem to get off the subject and move on. As a result, the rest of us conservatives who feel that a woman's decision to have a child is none of the states business find it hard to form a colition with the religious that think otherwise. I feel that government should be so small that it would not have a voice in personal affairs of this nature. Abortion, except in the the third trimester is nothing but a loss of lifeless tissue. I know as I have had to order a number of abortions to save that life of a mother. In the same respect I have seen a number of children that were unwanted and the parents made no attempt to hide their feels, particularly as their feels were violent in nature. I would say that if any of you want to round with me and see what happens to a child that is not wanted by the parents, then contact me and I will arrage it. I can promise you that you would make abortion number one on your accepted things to do. Taking of birth control pills is nothing more than a form of abortion. How many of your wives of girl friends do that? If abortion had anything to do with killing a child then I would find it against the law. As it is it is only stopping a pregunancy before life can occur.

But keep up the abortion rhetoric and lets watch as the country moves more to the left and is socialized. I for one feel that your emphasis on trying to get laws passed to control women and couples difficult decisions as one of the main reasons for the increasing powere of the left as you are chasing off a larger proportion of conservatives that feel it is ok for women to take control of themselves and not rely on the state to do so. Thus we can never be organized to repel the socialist as we must always worry that the religious right is going to be placed in power. Abortion is out of the box, it is not going back in not matter what you do or say, so get off it. As to Obama, he sucks and the only thing that is good about his administration is that we might have a split in the country and can once again be free.

I can imagine Davey-boy in 1859:

"But keep up the abolitionist rhetoric and lets watch as the country moves more to the slave-state side."

Pretty stupid reasoning, even for an abortion-worshipping Moby. Does he honestly think anyone is falling for his token "Obama sucks line?" Probably gets off looking at pictures of aborted fetuses, or something.

David: you feel?

Trying thinking instead.

"Abortion, except in the the third trimester is nothing but a loss of lifeless tissue. I know as I have had to order a number of abortions to save that life of a mother."

David, who are you that you have the power to "order" abortions? By your illiterate writing 'skills' I can see you lack sufficient education to be a doctor. Also no doctor would ever refer to living cells as "lifeless tissue" even if they doubt sentience.

I smell a lie. You're claiming to have experience that should give you authority but your ethos simply fails: your ignorance gives you away.

Stop polluting the libertarian argument with your ineptitude.

Folks, I'm not going to ask you to agree with David, but I considering I know who he is, what his speciality is, and where he practices medicine, I'd strongly advise against doubting what he does for a living, even if you disagree with his personal feelings on the subject of abortion.

http://www.catholic.org/video/?v=13

Dave should watch this video and then try to explain that what you see being pulled out of the womb is actually "lifeless tissue"..

Ok, to respond to the critics. My grammar in writing for a blog is very poor as I write as I think, not the proper Queen’s English. This makes for more stream on conscious and thus might not be appropriate for you elementary school training.
I found the video that you recommended to be interesting in its propaganda style. Note that it is sponsored by the Catholic Church which has long used sex to control its advocates. Most of the fetuses were in the late second trimester to early third trimester stages. Most abortions are first to early trimester. After that many doctor’s with counsel having the child. As to the dismemberment, ask yourself why the church would do that. This is their video and is obviously staged. Unless there is a problem in dilating the cervix, the material usually comes out much more intact. As you can see in the video the tissue is human formed but lifeless as there is no breathing or heart action. Thus does not meet the criteria for life as we define it. You will note that no one post the pictures of children that have been tortured by their parents and loved ones because they were a burden. Believe me that you do not want to see that.
As to the comparison to slavery issues in 1860, I do have a problem with the actions of the Federal government at that time. Slavery was a legitimate enterprise that the whole country was participating in. It was a substantial economic investment in the South and certain Yankee cities that provided the finances, ships, markets, insurance and every other aspect of the business that was necessary. The Federal government tried to make it part of their agenda even though they did not have the constitutional power to do so, thus one of the first intrusions into our lives and business that has progressively escalated to this day. Without this intrusion, slavery would have peacefully gone its way and Blacks would have been accepted into our society in a much better manner than has occurred. As it is, the religious of the day wanted their way and pushed until the country was torn apart and has not mended to this day.
But my point is that a large proportion of people feel uncomfortable with religion and morals should not be in the government any more than socialism. They feel that abortion is the rallying point for the religious and their attempts to push an agenda down our throats like the socialist; all of this without constitutional authority. We are all conservatives and want a different path for the country than the one being mapped out in Washington now. The problem is that those of us who do not have a religious agenda feel that by joining with the church groups, we are only trading one overbearing group for another. To beat Obama we need a united front that everyone can live with. If you harp on abortion, you are going to drive away people like myself who want the government out of all my affairs. Of course, if the country should split, I can live with that too. If you want to limit abortion, get your preachers to do their jobs and increase the moral content of the country, don’t try and legislate it.

Yada friggen yada...Bottom line is abortion is murder and those that perform abortions are murderers...It wouldn't break my heart if abortionists met with the same fate as Tiller...