November 06, 2009

Liberals Finally Got the Military Murders They've Been Asking For

Disdain for the military is a constant theme on the political left, a group that has consistently portrayed soldiers as violent psychopaths and babykillers for far longer than I've been alive. I've noted images of progressive protesters carrying signs attacking the troops on numerous occasions. Among the most galling of their constant steam of obscenities directed at our soldiers are variations of the sentiment, "We support our troops when they shoot their officers."

These same liberals must have been thrilled yesterday afternoon to discover that an officer opened fire on our troops. It's time for them to break out their magic markers and pen new signs to praise Major Nidal Malik Hasan for doing what they've asked.

I imagine that President Obama's old mentors Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn are also pleased with the attack. After all, they sent Ayer's girlfriend and other domestic terrorists of the Weather Underground to attack an Army dance at Fort Dix, an assault thwarted only by their own bomb-building ineptitude. If they had been competent, their attack on Fort Dix would likely have been worse than yesterday's assault.

So what say you, progressives... was the massacre of American soldiers all you dreamed it might be?

Posted by Confederate Yankee at November 6, 2009 12:17 PM
Soldiers who witnessed the rampage reported that the gunman shouted “Allahu Akbar!” — an Arabic phrase for “God is great!” — before opening fire

“Allahu Akbar!” == poor "harassed psychiatrist"

Now the "PC bunch", which seems to include the FBI, are telling us that his being a Muslim had nothing to do with the shootings. Instead we are to believe that he was merely a poor "harassed psychiatrist."

Apparently, anybody yelling “Allahu Akbar!” should now be considered a poor "harassed psychiatrist" hellbent on killing everybody nearby. I wonder if the American Psychiatric Association will now come under "Patriotic Act" scrutiny.

The only upside to this story is that the guy wasn't a Postal worker.

Posted by: Neo at November 6, 2009 12:20 PM

Learn more about the murderous, communist, Bill Ayers on our website (above) including FBI files.

Posted by: Commie Blaster at November 6, 2009 03:28 PM

How come we're not hearing more about the fact that Obama hand-picked this guy to be on his transition team and that he had ties to Napolitano?

Posted by: democratsarefascists at November 6, 2009 04:22 PM

"How come we're not hearing more about the fact that Obama hand-picked this guy to be on his transition team and that he had ties to Napolitano?"

Uh, because the best I can tell, Jerome Corsi made all of it up?

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at November 6, 2009 05:04 PM

Look up "nutpicking" and then come back and ask what liberals think of the shooting. Or better yet, find a single example of a prominent liberal supporting soldiers murdering fellow soldiers.

Posted by: Evan at November 6, 2009 06:21 PM

Ah yes: the weasel word "prominent".

Meanwhile, over at DKOS and DU you can find plenty of 'non-prominent' lefties doing exactly what CY noted above.

Posted by: ECM at November 7, 2009 12:34 AM

LOL. Yeah, the vast majority of liberals want every US soldier to die. Bob Owen's brand of citizen journalism is such a thing of beauty.

Using similar logic, EVERY conservative thinks that health care reform is JUST LIKE Dachau.

Posted by: Dave at November 7, 2009 11:40 AM

Hey, Evan, find an example of a prominent liberal condemning the signs above. From before the bodies started adding up....

Posted by: Foxfier at November 7, 2009 11:53 AM

Typical, I post a rational, objective, opinion of your post and like a good fascist, you censor dissent.

Posted by: Independence Hall at November 7, 2009 12:40 PM

Yeah Evan, real cute with the word "prominent". I've seen this before, every example will instantly not count.

You think that libs don't think it's funny, and the very next comment is Dave wearing his LOLerskates at the whole idea. Then admitting that the vast majority of liberals want every US soldier to die.

Then he gets sarcastic toward CY and conservatives.

Time to come clean, Evan. Bring Thom, Dude, and Jim.

Posted by: brando at November 7, 2009 04:59 PM

independence, if CY deleted your post its because you swore, like he says every time he deletes a post.

and Brando, don't forget lipiwitz, he's worse than dude

Posted by: MAModerate at November 7, 2009 08:25 PM

Good catch CY, I was thinking about those protest signs myself in the wake of the Ft. Hood shooting.

So the amended version of "we support our troops who shoot their officers" would be, "we support our officers who shoot their troops!" Eh?

Posted by: Brad at November 8, 2009 07:33 AM

Actually, this is a case of the officers shooting the troops. Still evil, still a liberal disaster, but not exactly what the second sign says to do.

Posted by: TimothyJ at November 8, 2009 02:27 PM

independence, if CY deleted your post its because you swore, like he says every time he deletes a post.
MAModerate, I did not swear at all, I have no need to resort to coarse language as I see no point in it. I am an Independent/Libertarian and made the statement that these type of posts are what drives people such as myself away from mainstream republicans, since I happen to know many good democratic/liberal families who have sons, daughters, and other family members in our military who would be appalled to read such a post stating that they have been asking for military murders! This politicizing of such tragedy does no one any good. These 2 people (two!!!) out of millions of liberals, if they even are liberals (as I see no proof of that) are disgusting, but this post lumping all liberals into the same is equally an abomination!

Posted by: Independence Hall at November 8, 2009 04:21 PM

IH, read Dave's comment.

Denouncing when Libs gloat over the death of servicemen is "equally" as bad as commiting mass murder?

Um. No.

The Ft. Hood Massacre and terrorist sympathizers are what drives you away from Republicans? Republicans? Wait. What? Really?

You can save the fake ignorance. "Liberals are anti-military? Since when? I've never seen that!"

Nobody's that blind.

Posted by: brando at November 8, 2009 05:10 PM

It may not be liberals that are anti-military, but the Democrats

Posted by: MAModerate at November 8, 2009 07:57 PM

MAModerate, that may be. I've been pretty careful to keep the words "Democrat" and "Liberal" seperate. Someone may be registered as a Democrat, but not be a full blown capital L Liberal.

I once had a Democrat tell me that all Democrats are Liberals, so that's sort of fun to throw in their faces once in while, but I can't believe that everyone that has voted for a Democrat, is pro-terrorism, pro-slavery(draft), pro-forced abortions/sterilizations, etc. Lots of overlap, yes, but they're not quite the same thing.

Posted by: brando at November 8, 2009 11:45 PM

Does Michael Moore count as prominent? As for insulting Libs, like Whoopi sez, it isn't what they call you, it is what you answer to!

Posted by: megapotamus at November 9, 2009 03:03 PM