December 15, 2009
So... Sully Isn't Sully?
Apparently, Andrew Sullivan's blog isn't solely his work, and turns out to have been a group blog largely ghost-written by two other people.
I'm not sure if I find any solace at all in discovering that his logical inconsistencies and bizarre fixations are instead part of a group psychosis.
How about you?
Stopped reading him ages ago. Not worth my time.
Posted by: garrettc at December 15, 2009 11:14 AMWell, there's strength in numbers, after all. I'm sure with such a strong delusion he must pay people to tell him he's being reasonable and misunderstood.
Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at December 15, 2009 11:41 AMA totally irrelevant writer and he has been for many moons. Haven't bothered with his diatribe in as long. Not surprised it's a "circle jerk" sort of blog. I am surprised he has friends.
Posted by: Dell at December 15, 2009 12:00 PMWill the discovery cause bloggers (e.g.present company) from trying to drive traffic to her?
On the other hand, my list of "must read" blogs is a lot shorter than it used to be. (used to be that I had to read quite a few to get the big picture. Now, I read one and find out what all the rest have written about.
Sad,really.
Posted by: Larry Sheldon at December 15, 2009 12:24 PMIt's all good, he stewed in his juices. And Andy gave himself a B+.
Posted by: brando at December 15, 2009 12:38 PMOh, I could tell when it wasn't Sullivan. No one can write the self-congratulatory, narcissistic drool than Andrew Sullivan writes.
What bothers me is that he gets PAID for that junk.
Posted by: Old Rebel at December 15, 2009 03:14 PMDamn, I less conservative blog to read.
Tarheel Repub Out!
Posted by: Tarheel Repub at December 15, 2009 03:36 PMI doubt that "Excitable Andy" really exists at all. I haven't ever seen his birth certificate.
Posted by: Neo at December 15, 2009 04:54 PMIt's Andy's Menage a Trois Blog.
Posted by: zhombre at December 15, 2009 10:01 PMWasn't this guy's claim to relevance always that he was the most trafficked one "man" op in the 'verse? That and being a gay "conservative". Looks like, as with all these moronic hoaxes that pervade our politics and media it was based on Big Lie Theory. I don't think even Goebbels would have thought it wise to base so much on BLT though. As we see, when it falls it all falls at once.
Posted by: megapotamus at December 16, 2009 07:58 AMWith Andy, two things were always in the forefront: 1) he was HUGE on gay marriage---putting that issue above all others, even the GWOT; and, 2) it was always apparent his(their?)judgment on individuals was consistently clouded by whether he/they would love to have sex with the individaul they were analyzing! The drooling over the prospect of fellating BHO was palpable!
I stopped reading his/their blog when those two "items" began to predominate serious discussions.
Posted by: Earl T at December 16, 2009 10:22 AMHow gobsmackingly vile that you bring this up :)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at December 16, 2009 04:53 PM
