May 17, 2010

Woody Allen Supports Obama for Dictator

And yes, the aging pedophile was dead serious:

In an interview published by Spanish language newspaper La Vanguardia (that we translated), Allen says "I am pleased with Obama. I think he's brilliant. The Republican Party should get out of his way and stop trying to hurt him."

But wait - there's more!

The director said "it would be good…if he could be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly."

In other news, Barack Obama thinks he's brilliant, that the Republican Party should get out of his way and stop trying to hurt him, and that he would make an excellent dictator.

Posted by Confederate Yankee at May 17, 2010 04:16 PM

Woody is a typical leftist in his outlook. It's
only his above-mean arrogance that has caused him
to reveal that kind of thinking. The rest have
it, but realize it is not quite mainstream. That
is why over 100 million have died under leftist
regimes. Nothing should get in the way of the
wonderful state.

Posted by: DleifsarbYrral at May 17, 2010 04:58 PM

As best I can tell, about 20% of the US is firmly in the Commie/Socialist camp. So if I understand, the majority of the US is supposed to get out of The One's way and allow him to continue to distroy our way of life. Great reasoning. How about this, lets divide the US and allow these nuts to have the Northeast, the rest of us can then continue with trying to prosper and live in freedom, kind of like we tried in 1860.

Posted by: David at May 17, 2010 07:08 PM

I have reached the same conclusion David but I am hoping for a better resolution than in 1860....

We probably need to include the west/left) coast in with the North east....


Posted by: s4f at May 17, 2010 07:22 PM

Why doesn't Mr. Allen give away his money to "the State" since he's all about that sort of crap??

Posted by: David at May 17, 2010 07:40 PM


Let's apply the standard media logic here. Woody Allen supports Obama. He also supports noted child rapist Roman Polanski. Therefore, Obama is a child rapist, right? I mean, this is the kind of logic that we are supposed to apply to tea partiers, so why not apply it here?

Agree with s4f and David, but I would add that the interior of California (as well as the interiors of some of the northeastern states) would rightfully belong with the rest of us.

Posted by: Will Gant at May 17, 2010 08:10 PM