October 07, 2008

The Man Who Controls Barack Obama

Just a month out from the 2008 Presidential elections, someone at CNN finally to a long, sober look at the carefully choreographed rise of Barack Obama through the staggeringly corrupt world of Chicago politics and thought, " My God, what have we done?"

The resulting panicked report is brutally factual.

Ace has more on the Obama-Ayers relationship. Roger Simon has more on Charles Manson-groupie Bernadine Dohrn's celebrity. I've got more on Obama-Ayers-Dohrn. Hell, I've got an even more damning article I haven't even posted yet that ties it all together.

The take-away?

If Bill Ayer's hands were any further up Barack Obama's backside, we'd have to change the Senator's name to Lambchop.

Posted by Confederate Yankee at October 7, 2008 12:45 AM

Watching this clip makes me puke.
Obama never liked terrorist duo Ayers, but worked/associated with them and their money anyway

Obama found America hater Jeremiah Wright represensible but stayed on in his church anyway, even donating him $ 20,000

Obama had nothing to do with slumlord crook Rezko but took Rezko's money and his land swap anyway

Obama finds hatemonger Pfleger racist but kept providing him taxpayer doleouts anyway

Obama doesn't get advice from terrorist Khalidi but has exchange of money with him

Obama agrees that Iran is a threat to the world but tries to sabotage a protest against A'jad in NYC anyway

Obama says he is not muslim but backs
sharia-Odinga anyway

Obama ppl say they have nothing to do with ACORN but they give ACORN $ 800,000 anyway

BTW what were the results of the CAC on math & science scores of the kids they pumped with their money?

Posted by: dhan_su at October 7, 2008 02:04 AM

Hussein is a dangerous man. We need to go further with his actions in 2006 in Kenya. This man wants the downfall of capitalist America.

Posted by: KansasGirl at October 7, 2008 07:25 AM

I like the way this guy puts it. He says most readers of the blog he contributes to could say the following:

* My career was not launched with the assistance of an unrepentant terrorist.

* My pastor has never said "God damn America."

* I don't think our troops are "just air-raiding villages and killing civilians."

* My spouse doesn't think America is a "downright mean country."

* I've never sat on a board with an unrepentant terrorist.

* I've never directed millions of dollars to radical organizations.

* I've never opposed requiring medical care for babies who are born alive.

* I bought my home without assistance from a convicted felon.

* I've never taken my kids to a church whose pastor thinks AIDS was created by the government.

If Obama's mainstream, most Americans are extremists.

Posted by: C-C-G at October 7, 2008 08:22 AM

I think there are two things that can be gleaned from the Obama camp's tepid response to the fact that recently, the Ayers story is gaining traction in the msm - first, most of what's being reported is TRUE. There is voluminous evidence, to include minutes from meetings and first-hand witness accounts about Obama's relationship with Ayers. Secondly, Obama and Ayers are two peas in a pod with respect to their radical politics, their vision of a socialist America, and their world view. Obama doesn't disagree with Ayers on much.

Americans have a right to know about the judgment of a potential president, and as we've seen, Barack Obama's judgment permitted him to work closely with an unrepentant domestic terrorist who bombed the pentagon, bombed the capitol building, robbed banks and killed people.

Posted by: vox at October 7, 2008 09:14 AM

The only quibble with the broadcast from the Collective Noise Network is still a very serious one, and is one the public needs to hear repeated enough that it is remembered. All those vast funds lavished from Obama's lofty Chair, according to Annenberg's official records, did absolutely nothing to improve the performance of the kids in learning.

Quibblers will quibble that Chicago schoolkids all improved slightly during that period, but the kicker is that those who were 'benefited' by the Annenberg dollars did no better than those that weren't.

Methinks that those enormous resources were diverted away from actual education to organizations whose purposes were either political indoctrination of the kids, or developing warchests for ACORN-style intimidation by mob action.

Now that the dam is broken at the MSM, let them 'follow the money' and see who profited at the expense of the kids.

And it's amusing to game this post so that the censor does not abolish the naming of them who must not be named.

Posted by: Micropotamus at October 7, 2008 10:28 AM

If Bill Ayer's hands were any further up Barack Obama's backside, we'd have to change the Senator's name to Lambchop.

Jeepers, but you have the gift. I will be laughing about this hyserical turn of phrase all day long. Thanks for a hearty chuckle!

Posted by: marybel at October 7, 2008 12:24 PM

Micro, you will find that the dispersed funds explicity went to activist groups as opposed to the budget of any running school. Of course this is in line with Ayers stated priorities which were radical indoctrination at the expense of anything we would recognize as education. Trinity United recieved funds as did ACORN. But the big beneficiary of all this loose lucre was Barack Obama. It was on the weight of his "success" at this perversity that Barack began his "electoral" career. The sneer quotes are employed based on the ballot manipulation employed by Barry to secure his first seat.

Posted by: megapotamus at October 7, 2008 12:45 PM

I noticed that Cooper tried to bury the negative in the reporting with his questions to the reporter, and the reporter didn't answer them well.

The first question Cooper labeled the connection as simply educational reform -- and the reporter had reported enough - he should have been able to answer that the educational reform was outside the mainstream and questionable.

In the 2nd question, Cooper said Obama had already publicly disagreed with Ayers to which the reporter answered that he had condemned the terrorist acts.....but that is a far cry from saying Obama disagrees with Ayers on a number of important ideas/issues.

Posted by: usinkorea at October 7, 2008 02:12 PM

did absolutely nothing to improve the performance of the kids in learning

Of course not. When your goal is political indoctrination, learning is always secondary.

Posted by: PA at October 8, 2008 06:08 PM