February 08, 2008
Scotland Yard: Blast Killed Bhutto
In The Sun:
British officials are set to release a summary later today of a report on the probe into PPP Party chief Bhutto’s December 27 death.Scotland Yard investigators said Bhutto died from a severe headwound as she was thrown by the force of the blast.
They also said that the attack was carried out by a single person who blew himself up after opening fire, not by two as authorities had originally reported.
The finding supports the Pakistani Government’s version of events.
But what about the bullet theory, seemingly supposed by video? As I noted December 31:
While the new film shows her hair and shawl moving, however, it is not conclusive.Unlike the Zapruder-filmed assassination (YouTube) of John F. Kennedy, however, there is not the spray of flesh and bone one might have expected from a pistol blast at near contact range of approximately six feet.
The ballistics expert interviewed by Channel 4, Roger Gray, notes the concussive blast of the bullet hitting her hair and shawl and suggests that it indicates a bullet strike on the left side of Bhutto's head. There were not, however, any direct signs of an invasive impact to Bhutto's skull as seen with Kennedy, just the movement of her hair and shawl. One might think that a bullet hitting Bhutto on the left side of the skull, penetrating, and exiting the right side of her skull would have shown signs of exiting in the form of a spray of blood and bone, which was not evident in the film footage.
So while it is probable that Bhutto was struck by a bullet, it is not conclusive, and the government account of her hitting her head cannot be conclusively ruled out.
In short, Scotland Yard seems to bring us back to square one: the seemingly bizarre Pakistani claim that Bhutto was killed when the blast threw her against the right rear sunroof latch of the armored car in which she was riding. The claim, however, is the only one that seems to make logical sense if the assassin's bullet did in fact miss.
Ever helpful, the Bhutto family has refused a request to have an autopsy performed, and her political party instead issues forth absurd claims that she was killed with a laser.
It seems that the Bhutto family is far more concerned with supporting the story of her martyrdom by an assassin's bullet than seeking what may be a less glamorous martyrdom by the force of the suicide blast throwing her skull against the right rear sunroof latch. If they continue to refuse an autopsy, we can only surmise they are more interested in preserving mythology than divining the facts.
*Gasp*
A political party more interested in preserving mythology and diving the facts?
That sounds familiar ...
Posted by: Dan Irving at February 8, 2008 09:57 AMIt should be noted that the disturbances of the corpse involved in an autopsy would be considered desecration under Islamic law, and are not allowed. As such, autopsies are rare in Islamic countries.
Posted by: dawnfire82 at February 8, 2008 12:21 PM